On the validity of "comparing" DT to NW
Jan. 4th, 2007 08:13 amIt's kind of like justifying why I prefer to listen to Chopin over Bach. They're composers of completely different styles, in different forms, for different instruments, for different reasons. I like some music from their respective periods (Scarlatti and Schubert for example), and dislike some from the same (e.g. Handel, Wagner); so it's not a matter of liking one period of Classical music more than another*.
Yet it is completely valid to say that "I like Chopin more than Bach for the following reasons: ..."
...but not the same for contemporary bands?
*Again, such labels of periods are arbitrary, and therefore there is *still* no such thing as the "Finnish national style of metal." Thank you.
Yet it is completely valid to say that "I like Chopin more than Bach for the following reasons: ..."
...but not the same for contemporary bands?
*Again, such labels of periods are arbitrary, and therefore there is *still* no such thing as the "Finnish national style of metal." Thank you.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-04 04:25 pm (UTC)If you've never read "High Fidelity", I suggest it to you. It's a good novel in any case, and it's about a music lover and obliquely about music criticism and asshats. :)
You don't have to be a singer to notice that some music is worse than others.
Date: 2007-01-09 09:56 am (UTC)This is an arrogance that you both need to overcome.
Just because I can't build space-rockets doesn't mean that when a space shuttle blows up I can't recognize that somebody failed. Just because I can't drive race-cars doesn't mean I can't recognize that Dale Earnhardt made a mistake.
There is a difference between ability and recognition.
I know a guitarist who would amaze you, but I can't play anything other than "Red River Valley"
Does that mean I can't understand his talent?
Re: You don't have to be a singer to notice that some music is worse than others.
Date: 2007-01-09 01:12 pm (UTC)To use your engineering example, it's as if someone, who has never written a line of code in their life, has the power to decide that since you've written code for a pill-sorting robot, that's the only job you'll ever be able to get: writing code for only pill-sorting robots. Because you don't have experience writing code for a different sort of robot (or a washing machine or a web site).
(and then I went on to say that both art and music are personal taste issues, and that there are people who very much enjoy both art and music that I don't.)
Re: You don't have to be a singer to notice that some music is worse than others.
Date: 2007-01-09 03:43 pm (UTC)I think one of the more interesting characteristics of fine art is that it is intrinsically selfish - 'for the glory of God' is rarely the excuse these days, as it was in the days of Bach. As something that is made by its creator to serve (often) the whims of its creator (unless it's commissioned or something), works of art are definitely subject to personal taste, and one man's absolute trash is another man's masterpiece.
I mean, I don't like most abstract art, but for some reason I like Rothko :o
no subject
Date: 2007-01-04 05:32 pm (UTC)"I like apples better because..."
or "I like oranges better than apples..."
Both are fruit, but you can't compare them.